Although I do mention and describe Alison
Coil’s, “Why Men Don’t Believe the Data on Gender Bias in Science”, and Daniel
Heath Justice’s, “Demanding Kinder Classrooms Doesn’t Make You a Snowflake”, I
went into greater depth for Adrienne Rich’s speech, “Claiming an Education” because
it was the reading I felt I could relate to and was the most zealous about. In Coil’s
informative article, she focuses on gender and sex discrimination within STEM
programs. Even though there is data proving
gender bias within STEM, male researches refuse to acknowledge this and
instead use false data to get their desired results: that there is no gender
bias in STEM. In Justice’s article, he explains how “Right-wing pundits and
conservatives” treat students as “enemies or defectives” are only able to see
the world through one lens and categorize these students because of their differences.
In Rich’s passionate speech, she emphasizes the importance of claiming
responsibility for yourself.
As a child, I knew what responsibility was
about and how one could be responsible for others, however, until reading this,
I never considered how responsibility pertained to taking care of oneself. I could relate to Rich’s description that women
as nurturers are often told that “taking responsibility toward yourself…comes
second to our relationships and responsibilities to other people”. I too was brought
up this way and was taught to be selfless and put others first. This made me
realize that in doing so, however, I neglect my own needs. Still, I struggle
with the idea of taking care of myself first because it is hard for me not to
associate it as a selfish act. The adjectives for responsibility are: authority,
control, power, and leadership. One of Rich’s main arguments is that women
cannot expect to be treated with respect, they have to demand it from society. If
we go through life with passivity and forgo the ability to be responsible for
ourselves, we give up the power to control how society views us, thus allowing
them to think we are not capable, authoritative leaders. Furthermore, I realized that it is my responsibility and duty
as a woman to be an active participant in this society so that others will not do
my “thinking, talking, and naming” (Rich).
Collectively, these three readings
challenged me to think back to my childhood and consider how I have changed. While
reflecting on my characteristics as a child, I realized that I was more confident
and willing to voice my opinion in the classroom. Ironically, as I’ve become an
adult, I have transgressed into somebody who feels more timid, somebody who “sits
in passive silence” (Rich) in the classroom. Why is this? Perhaps it is because
of the ideas Johnson discussed in “Patriarchy, The System”; The natural,
biological characteristics of men are more highly valued and respected than the characteristics of
women. Maybe these characteristics which Johnson described are the reason why
both males and females “Don’t believe that women are as good at doing science”
(Coil). As women, we cannot let these biological characteristics devalue, stereotype,
and misrepresent us. Similarly, Indigenous and racialized students struggle
with “the historical and current effects of an education that misrepresents
them…as subhuman, uncivilized, and uneducable” (Justice, pg 2). Coil, Rich and
Justice all agree that academia, textbooks, and lectures are not an accurate
portrayal of our history because they exclude a large amount of the population.
Rich points out that there are still, “very few women in the upper levels of
faculty and administration”. This statistic peaked my curiosity, so I decided
to look up Colgate’s percentage of female to male faculty ratio. On Colgate’s demographics
page, 2016-2017, I found that out of
the Full-Time Faculty, 56.2% were male and 43.8% were female. As you can see,
Colgate is not exempt from this category of schools in which women are
underrepresented.
All of these readings focus
on the importance of what Rich would say, “a fresh vision”. These readings instill
hope that as a generation we can change and dismantle these systematic social systems
which stereotype, devalue, and dehumanize women. Thus, I believe that in order to disassemble
these cyclical social structures such as oppression and patriarchy, we as women,
and especially as scholars, have to demand that society gives us the respect we
so rightly deserve.
- Jane B
Comments
Post a Comment